Violence Hits Cameroon Over English vs. French Government

vcamAnti-government demonstrators block a road in Bamenda, Cameroon, December 8, 2016.
Share
Print
YAOUNDE, CAMEROON —
Several people were killed and hundreds more were arrested or are missing Thursday in northwest Cameroon in violence that followed rallies by the country’s English-speaking minority. They were protesting what they call the overbearing influence of French in the bilingual country. Some are demanding a return to federalism while others are asking for secession from the Republic of Cameroon.

Protesters in Bamenda, the capital of the northwest region of Cameroon, came out to stop the ruling CPDM party and the prime minister of Cameroon, Philemon Yang, from organizing a so-called “Peace rally,” intended to halt Anglophone protests that started last month.

Yewong Petra, a resident of Bamenda, says the military shot at protesters who were hoisting blue and white flags that are an symbols of the English speaking regions that want to separate from the French speaking parts of Cameroon.

“The people of Bamenda are hoisting a flag that is not recognized,” Petra said. “You cannot, in a nation, hoist a flag that is not recognized by the people. If it was a white flag, I would understand it is for peace. Hoisting a flag that symbolizes something like a secessionist attitude is going to provoke the military.”

The government said two people were killed, but some residents and media outlets reported there were at least seven deaths.

victim of violence in Cameroon
victim of violence in Cameroon

1479992138430

Soldiers clear a road in Bamenda, Cameroon, December 8, 2016.
Soldiers clear a road in Bamenda, Cameroon, December 8, 2016.
In 1961, a vote was held in what are today’s northwest and southwest English speaking regions of Cameroon. The referendum was over whether to join Nigeria, which had already obtained independence from Britain, or the Republic of Cameroon, which had obtained independence from France. Voters elected to become part of French speaking Cameroon, and the country practiced a federal system of government. English and French became the official languages of Cameroon.

Ebune Charles, historian at the University of Yaounde, says since 1972, when a new constitution was adopted replacing a federal state with a unitary state, French speaking Cameroonians have failed to respect the linguistic and cultural nature of the minority English speaking Cameroonians.

“We were supposed to have predominantly English speaking administrators in the predominantly English speaking regions of the northwest and the southwest, and that is not the case,” Ebune said. “We were expecting official documents signed in both languages; that is not the case. Presidential decrees come only in one language. If you look at the level of the military, that is where it is so scandalous. It is just in one language but we are in a bilingual country.”

Charles also pointed out that the country’s currency is printed only in French, notice boards even in the English speaking regions are mostly in French, and more than 70 percent of radio and TV programs in the state media are in French.

The ongoing protests started when lawyers in the English speaking regions asked for French speaking judges who are not of the common law system to be transferred out of courts in those regions. They declared that justice can’t be rendered when the judge, the advocate and the suspect can’t communicate.

They also asked that the OHADA business law used by French African countries be translated into English.

When those requests were not granted, they refused to defend clients in court.

Teachers also went on strike to protest what they said was an overbearing influence of French in schools.

Professor George Dopgima Nyamdi, politician and former presidential aspirant, says the situation degenerated because the government has refused to listen to the cries of English speaking Cameroonians.

“If things like this happen to a country, it means there is something fundamentally wrong that must be addressed,” Nyamdi said.

As the strikes continue, with violence closing schools, universities and markets, the Catholic Church has been calling for dialogue.

“The prime minister … is setting up a committee, he has appointed the chairperson of the committee so why not give him a chance,” Cornelius Esua Fontem, the archbiship of Bamenda said. “There is a move of dialogue and we should not refuse that move. We want the government to prove that they too are coherent.”

It is not the first time English speaking Cameroonians have protested. In 1984, they created the “Cameroon Anglophone Movement” to press for a return to the federal system, which eventually started calling for independence.

THE ANGLOPHONE PROBLEM: LESSON TO MY FRANCOPHONE BROTHERS

francoRecall that though both Nigeria and “La Repubique du Cameroun” promised a Federal Union with The Southern Cameroons, “La Republique du Cameroun”, being smaller than Nigeria, agreed on a FEDERAL union with The Southern Cameroons as two equal states of the Federation. “La Republique du Cameroun” pledged never to use its larger population and annex The Southern Cameroons.

Two things happened:

1) The whip-wielding French comrades of the Federation manifested domestic truancy which led to the total destruction and subsequent dissolution of the foundation on which the Union rested and a complete repudiation of the very idea of The Southern Cameroons and “La Republique du Cameroun”.

2) Following this, was colonial imperialism, the annexation and armed occupation of The Southern Cameroons.

These two moves (overthrow of The Federal Constitution Order and the revival of “La Repubique du Cameroun”) meant the status of The Southern Cameroons have been degraded from that of a self-government of an independent state to that of a dependent territory, thus The Southern Cameroonians have become a colonised people under alien subjugation.

The May 20, 1972 Referendum was firstly UNCONSTITUTIONAL in that, it violated Article 47 of the Federal Constitution which stipulated the method of amending it. It stated that:

Any proposal for the revision of the present constitution which impair the unity and integrity of the Federation shall be inadmissible” (Federal Constitution of 1961)

Ahidjo’s hidden agenda, which was the destruction of the Federation and the subsequent assimilation of The Southern Cameroonians was revealed in the Referendum of May 20, 1972.

Since the 1972 Referendum, relationship between the Francophone and the Anglophones have never been the same. Dr John Ngu Foncha in his letter of resignation from the ruling C.P.D.M. party stated that:

“The constitution that I have held and preached as the supreme law of the land is in many respect being ignored or manipulated. People are encouraged to support a flagrant violation of the constitution by going out on marches against the existence of multiple parties”
(Foncha 1990)




The rational behind the Referendum was to destroy the culture of The Southern Cameroons and dismantle its institutions especially in the spheres of legislative government, House of Chiefs, Judiciary, Police force, economic development etc, this was in a bit to accelerate the exploitation with impunity of The Southern Cameroons.

Mr Paul Biya, placed the last nail on The Southern Cameroons casket and being Ahidjo’s well groomed and hand-picked successor, finalised Ahidjo’s diabolic agenda by unilaterally and by a mere Presidential decree promulgated law No. 80.001 of February 4, 1984 abolishing The United Republic of Cameroon and resuscitating in its place “La Republique du Cameroun”.

This unconstitutional change of the country’s name was an ACT OF SECESSION by “La Republique du Cameroun” from the original Union. Remember that the name “La Republique du Cameroun” is the name French “Cameroun” assumed when it became independent on January 1, 1960, without The Southern Cameroons, and became admitted into membership of the United Nations. It equally gained international recognised boundaries.

If this be the case, where is the identity of The Southern Cameroons?

Fon Gordi Dinka, the first President of The United Republic of Cameroon Bar Association, in reaction to this unconstitutional behaviour and in a bit to salvage the situation, bearing in mind, other accumulated grievances, addressed a petition to President Paul Biya. In the protest letter entitled THE NEW SOCIAL ORDER, Dinka accused Biya SECESSION AND ANNEXATION. He argued that by reviving the old name “La Republique du Cameroun”, which was submerged at the Foumban Conference to create a Federation with The Southern Cameroon, this means “La Republique du Cameroun” has seceded from the Union and any claim by la Republique du Cameroun to govern The Southern Cameroons means pure annexation.

Mockery and stereotyping are unavoidable features that have dug rifts between Anglophones and Francophones. This include discrimination in public services, promotions, examinations, admission into schools, mockery references and even psycho-social issues. J.N. Foncha in his resignation letter from the C.P.D.M. emphasized that:

“…the Anglophone whom I brought into the Union have been ridiculed and referred to as ‘les ennemis dans la maison’, ‘les biafrans’, ‘les tritres’… ”

In recent times, what is prevalent is “les sécessionnistes”. Such appellations are derogatory and meant to dehumanise or disenfranchise Anglophones. When Ni John Fru Ndi, an Anglophone, forcefully launched the Social Democratic Fund (S.D.F.) on May 24, 1990, the Anglophones were referred to as ‘traitors’. Also, when continuous Anglophone pressure for democracy forced The National Assembly to adopt in November the Multipartism law and Biya promulgating it into law on December 19, 1990, the Anglophones were referred to as ‘les ennemis dans la maison”.

These derogatory words on Anglophones dismiss the fact that the Anglophone problem is elitist but an issue which has eaten deep into the fabrics of the country’s grassroots.

The UN Sponsored plebiscite of February 11, 1961, is the hardcore of The Southern Cameroon question today. The plebiscite mortgaged The Southern Cameroons’ independence and reunification with “La Republique du Cameroun” that is in violation of UN Resolution 1514 if 1960 on the granting of independence to all colonial and trust territories.

The plebiscite was based on two obnoxious clauses that denied The Southern Cameroons of its right to sovereign independence. The two alternatives were:

a) Do you wish to achieve independence by joining the independent “La Republique du Cameroun?”
or
b) Do you wish to achieve independence by joining The Federal Republic of Nigeria?

Reactions from The Southern Cameroons had advocated a third option which was that of total independence. Unfortunately, the UN rejected the third option.

The UN had pushed The Southern Cameroons into this mess by limiting her options for Independence and failing to respect its own UN Resolution 1514 of 1960. The funny UN proceedings and non-implementations of the UN Resolution 1608 approving a post plebiscite conference had frustrated The Southern Cameroons’ right to self-determination.

The said UN Resolution appointed a commission of three constitutional experts to be nominated one from “La Republique du Cameroun”, another from The Southern Cameroons, enabling then to form a Federal United Republique as contained in the UN Resolution 1608(XV) of 1961.

At this time, “La Republique du Cameroun” was already independent while The Southern Cameroons was enjoying regional status in Nigeria. Their reasons for this committee of experts on constitutional matters was to mediate between “La Republique du Cameroun” and The Southern Cameroons whose independence was to be assumed at the unification, thus the UN intervention was to assure the balance of power.

Unfortunately, the UN and Britain, the administering powers failed to attend the conference while the French supported and advised the Francophone Republic. The UN and British absence was a betrayal of The Southern Cameroonian.

The two questions were against the spirit of the Mamfe Conference which resolved that The Southern Cameroons should first be independent before thinking of re-unification. The resolution of The Mamfe Conference was effectively placed before the UN but was ignored. The plebiscite was therefore something that was forced down the throat of The Southern Cameroonians and is still hunting them today.

Dr J.N. Foncha, The Southern Cameroons Prime Minister who led The Southern Cameroons to independence in his letter to the British, the UN and member countries titled “Startling Revelation from British Declassified documents on The Southern Cameroons” revealed that:

“There is an increasing movement in The Southern Cameroons in favour of a third choice in plebiscite-total independence with United Kingdom Aid. We have not supported this proposition when I wrote my letter 1519/1/60 of June 7, about Cameroons, I had not seen Hell’s letter 1847/11230 of May 25 to Kale about the third question… The terms of the last sentence of that letter cause me concern…”(Declassified UK document).

There is no legal union of the Cameroons, Yaounde seceded since 1984. This means, the territory of the Southern Cameroons is occupied, its citizens annexed and its resources plundered. Only a return to the Pre-1972 status (Federation) can salvage this problem, failure of which will lead to Independence of the Southern Cameroons as Ambazonia Republic.

By Dr.Tee Ebogo-Ngwa
Yaounde

PRESS RELEASE DEMILITARISE BRITISH SOUTHERN CAMEROONS FOR PEACEFUL RESOLUTION OF POLITICAL CONFLICT

pic5-bdaWe hail and salute the nationalistic consciousness and patriotism demonstrated by all the people – men, women, youths and students – of British Southern Cameroons in solidarity with the Common Law Lawyers and the ongoing strike declared by the Teachers Trade Unions.

We whole heartedly salute the Common Law Lawyers and the Teachers who as custodians respectively of the Common Law heritage and the Anglo-Saxon Educational system have dutifully risen to combat assimilation and the annihilation of our core values and identity by the neo coloniser la Republique du Cameroun. But the problem is far larger than meets the bird’s eye view.

We must get rid of this tripod evil – ANNEXATION, ASSIMILATION and INSTITUTIONALISED VIOLENCE. These three evils are imposed on us by la Republique du Cameroun. To get rid of them we must first get rid of la Republique du Cameroun, the incarnation of the evil tripod.

The ongoing strike by the Common Law Lawyers and the Teachers Trade Unions is consequent upon the intransigence and the devil-inspired insensitivity of the Yaoundé dictatorship. Had President Paul Biya harkened and respected the Banjul Ruling on Communication 266/2003 endorsed by the AU Summit in July 2009, Libya, and had the approved Constructive Dialogue taken place and agreed terms implemented, things would not have degenerated to this painful point of anger and hatred.

One of the strong points in the Ruling is the call for an end to arrest, transfer, detention and trial of Southern Cameroonians for crimes allegedly committed in British Southern Cameroons by Civil Law judges in French in la Republique du Cameroun courts and military tribunals.

In addition to flouting the ruling with impunity, the worst has been visited on the people. Firstly, while arbitrary arrests, kidnapping to la Republique du Cameroun for kangaroo trials in French is still on, e.g. the Wum Saga, Southern Cameroons Courts and judiciary are now flooded with magistrates steeped in Napoleonic code, among other measures aimed at annihilating the Common Law completely. The Common Law Lawyers have thus seen silence as collaboration for self-destruction and extinction of British Southern Cameroons identity.




At the level of education harmonization was tailored to expedite assimilation and consolidate annexation for the prestige and grandeur of la Republique du Cameroun. Proud of the inherited Anglo Saxon educational system and core values which has given us self-esteem, community spirit, sense of commonweal as opposed to la Republique du Cameroun spirit of individualism, grabbing and corrupt culture, the Teachers Trade Unions and other stakeholders of the British Southern Cameroons educational system have out rightly rejected harmonisation, euphemism for assimilation and dehumanisation of the British Southern Cameroons.

The peaceful strike has swept across from north to south and east to west for Southern Cameroonians after more than half a century of la Republique du Cameroun barbaric domination and alien rule have come to the end of the road and can bear it no more. But why use of live bullets by occupation forces?

pic-1-bda pic2-bda pic3-bda pic4-bda pic5-bdapic6-bda

THE PEOPLE’S CALL OF HISTORY AND POSITION;

  1. No Southern Cameroonian should allow himself/herself to be used against his people. Enough of treachery by fortune seekers.
  2. No more dialogue with the coloniser and annexationist. The colonial occupier knows only the dialogue of the grave yard. The only acceptable thing and that which the people want is negotiation for peaceful separation under the UN as the umpire. Peaceful separation will enable the two nations and peoples live as good neighbours as before 1961.
  3. The official language of British Southern Cameroons, in addition to the languages of nationalities, is English. Not banning the teaching of other foreign languages, English is the language of instruction in school, the language of use in offices, churches and other official transactions.
  4. For peaceful resolution of the political conflict between British Southern Cameroons and la Republique du Cameroun;
  5. We call on all Southern Cameroonians in Parliament of la Republique du Cameroun to learn from the lessons of 1953 and as representatives of the people dutifully COME BACK HOME for necessary consultation and positive action in the supreme interest of their people. Makers of progressive history are not those who have never erred, they are people who learn from their mistakes and for the common good rise to the challenge of their time. History is watching!
  6. We call on all The Natural Rulers, the fathers of the original nations amalgamated to create British Southern Cameroons, the political leaders and Religious Authorities, to take judicious notice of the plight of our people and speak out in defense of TRUTH, FREEDOM and JUSTICE and inherent right to self-determination and SOVEREIGN INDEPENDENCE, for to pretentiously be indifferent is treachery.
  7. We call on Yaoundé to demilitarise the British Southern Cameroons to create an enabling environment for necessary negotiation for peaceful separation. The current military reinforcement with troops armed to the teeth, arbitrary arrests, torture, detentions, is provocation too much for a people subjected to a constant reign of terror.
  8. We call on the UN to learn from its past mistakes and not play the ostrich and allow la Republique du Cameroun “agents provocateurs” sent into this former UN Trust Territory ignite an unrest whose consequences will leave a dark scar on the conscience of the UN.

Done in Buea this 22nd Day of November, 2016

For the SCNC and in the name of the people of British Southern Cameroons.

 

 

 

 

NFOR, N. NFOR

National Chairman, (SCNC)

 

Cc;

Common Law Lawyers

Teachers Trade Unions

Religious Authorities

Diplomatic Missions in Yaoundé,

ACHPR, Banjul, The Gambia

Pan African Parliament, Midrand 1685, Gauteng Province, South Africa

Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, London

AU Commission Chairman, Addis Ababa

Commonwealth SG, London

UN SG, New York, USA

The Press

Archives

12 FACTS ABOUT THE TERRITORY OF THE SOUTHERN CAMEROONS

scn1. The Southern Cameroons has a surface area of 43,000 sq. km and a current population of about 6 million people. It is thus demographically bigger than at least 60 UN and 18 AU Member States, and spatially bigger than at least 30 UN and 12 AU Member States. Located in the ‘armpit’ of Africa, it is sandwiched between Nigeria and Republique du Cameroun like a wedge between West Africa and what in effect is still French Equatorial Africa. It has frontiers to the west and north with Nigeria, to the east with Republique du Cameroun, and to the south with the Equatoria Guinean Island of Bioko. The borders are well attested by international boundary treaties.

2. The natural resources of the Southern Cameroons include oil, gas, timber, coffee, cocoa, tea, bananas, oil palm, rubber, wildlife, fish, medicinal plants, waterfalls and a wide variety of fruit and agricultural produce.
3. The territory later identified as the Southern Cameroons was originally British from 1858-1887. It was ceded to Germany and subsequently incorporated into the contiguous German protectorate of Kamerun, which had been acquired earlier in 1884.

4. A 1913 Anglo-German Treaty respecting the settlement of the frontier between the British territory of Nigeria and the German territory of Kamerun from Lake Chad to the sea. That territorially grounded treaty has remained the instrument defining the international boundary between Nigeria and the Southern Cameroons. Moreover, a 1954 British Order in Council (Definition of Boundaries Proclamation) defined the boundary between the Eastern Region of Nigeria and the Southern Cameroons.

5. The same territory that had been ceded in 1887 by Britain to Germany was captured by British forces in September 1914 soon after the outbreak of World War I. It later became known as the British Cameroons, consisting of two separate parts, the Southern Cameroons and the Northern Cameroons.

6. Germany held on to its original Kamerun protectorate until 1916 when Anglo-French forces captured it. France took possession of the territory and it became known as French Cameroun. In 1916 therefore, Germany ceased to exercise any territorial authority (sovereignty) over Kamerun. The utter defeat of Germany entailed the loss of its colonial territory. Under Articles 118 and 119 of the 1919 Versailles Treaties Germany renounced and relinquished all rights in and title to all its overseas possessions, including her Kamerun territory.




7. An Anglo-French treaty of 1916 (the Milner-Simon Declaration) defined the international boundary between the British Cameroons and French Cameroun. This territorial delimitation was confirmed by the League of Nations in 1922 when the two territories were separately placed under the Mandates System. The territorial alignment was further confirmed by the Anglo-French Treaty of 9 January 1931, signed by the Governor-General of Nigeria and the Governor of French Cameroun.

8. The Southern Cameroons was thus under British rule from 1858 to 1887, and then from 1915 to 1961, a total period of nearly 80 years. That long British connection left an indelible mark on the territory, bequeathing to it an Anglo-Saxon heritage. The territory’s official language is English. Its educational, legal, administrative, political, governance and institutional culture and value systems are all English-derived.

9. The Southern Cameroons was under international tutelage with the status of a class ‘B’ territory, first as a British-Mandated Territory of the League of Nations from 1922-1945, and then as a British-administered United Nations Trust Territory from 1946 to 1961.

10. Under Article 22 of the Treaties of Versailles the Mandatory Power accepted and undertook to apply “the principle that the well-being and development of [the inhabitants of the territories concerned] form a sacred trust of civilization.” At the end of World War II the international mandates system was transmuted to the international trusteeship system under chapters XII and XIII of the UN Charter.

11. By Article 73 of that Charter the Administering Power “recognize the principle that the interests of the inhabitants of [territories whose peoples have not yet attained a measure of self-government] are paramount, and accept as a sacred trust the obligation to promote to the utmost, within the system of international peace and security established by the present Charter, the well-being of the inhabitants of those territories.” One of the basic objectives of the international trusteeship system, as stated in Article 76 b of the Charter, is “to promote the political, economic, social, and educational advancement of the inhabitants of the trust territories, and their progressive development towards self-government or independence as may be appropriate to the particular circumstances of each territory and its peoples and the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned, and as may be provided by the terms of each trusteeship agreement.”

12. Up to 1960, the Southern Cameroons though under international tutelage was administered by Britain as part of her contiguous colonial territory of Nigeria. But its distinct identity and personality, separate from Nigeria, remained unassailable. UN Resolution 224 (III) of 18 November 1948 protected the Trust Territory from annexation by any colonial-minded neighbour. While acknowledging that the Trusteeship Agreement makes allowance for ‘administrative union’, the Resolution provides that “Such a union must remain strictly administrative in its nature and scope, and its operation must not have the effect of creating any conditions which will obstruct the separate development of the Trust Territory, in the fields of political, economic, social and educational advancement, as a distinct entity.”

As published by the THE AFRICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS- Banjul.

THE ANNEXATION AND ASSIMILATION OF ANGLOPHONE EDUCATION

Nursery, Primary, Secondary, and High School Teachers including the University of Buea and Bamenda lecturers have called for an industrial strike on November 21st for a number of reasons. They are joining the Common Law Lawyers who have been protesting now for over a month.

In a communiqué that was released on October 26th, 2016 by All Teachers Trade Unions and Associations of Anglophone Extraction, they listed a number of worries.

  • The withdrawal and re-posting of all French-speaking teachers from Anglophone classrooms with the exception of bilingual teachers.
  • The withdrawal of francophone lecturers and administrators from Anglo-Saxon universities of Bamenda and Buea and their colleges of education.
  • The recruitment of competent Anglophones to teach in various departments of colleges and faculties of the university of Bamenda.
  • The withdrawal and re-orientation of all francophones reading English modern letters in Higher Teachers training college Bambili and other schools of education in Cameroon to departments where they have an academic background.

on these grounds the teachers are demanding:

– The deployment of Anglophone teachers sent to francophone colleges

– The immediate halt of the practice of sending francophone student teachers to practice on Anglophone students.

–  The immediate stoppage of CAP, PROBATOIRE TECHNIQUE and BACCALAUREAT TECHNIQUE from the English sub-system.

– The creation of the Cameroon National council and Le ConseilNational de L’education du Cameroun (CNC/CNEC)
–  The institution of a mandatory one-year industrial attachment program for trainees of the Higher Technical Teacher’s Training College Bambili and Kumba.

It should be noted that these complaints have been submitted to government 10 months ago and none of their demands have been met, rather there is an overtly intensified devious machination to wreak havoc on Anglophones and their sub-system of education thereby pushing them to the fringes of social and educational advancement.




In light of this lamentable situation whereby Anglophones are continuously denigrated, subjugated and treated as a colonised people while children are groomed for slavery, these associations have together declared an indefinite strike action while urging the government NOT to use their machinery of force to provoke any stakeholder or carry out any action that might lead to loss of life and/or property.

“..Just take a look at the faculty of engineering, University of Buea. Anglophones have no place there. Over 85% of the first and second-year students are Francophones. Most Anglophones who did very well at the GCE did not succeed in getting into the school. I think we also have to talk to the VCs and Deans of all Anglophone Universities, to make sure Anglophone children are given priority. Francophones have engineering schools in Yaounde, Douala, yet want to deprive Anglophones from Buea. It is also necessary to take a look at the entrance exams into ENSET Kumba/Bambili and also ENS. Over 90% of the intakes are Francophones. This explains why Anglophone Universities are littered with the French language everywhere. It is indeed, not only outright marginalization but an educational genocide. It should be recalled that the moral standards in most of our mission schools have dropped because of the infiltration of francophone children…”

UNDERSTANDING THE COMMON LAW- THE DIFFERENCE

lawCitizens from former British Southern Cameroons have been wondering what is common law especially those who have not been privy to study law in the University. Cameroon has two types of legal system. The Common and Civil Law. In this article, Donatus Wan-Obi, former UB Student Union Chairman and a legal mind himself, gave the ABC of the common law in the most simple terms for our understanding. It is important that when we talk about Common Law and when we support our lawyers, we should be aware of what we are saying. These short questions and responses will help us gather.

Common law is law that is made by judges rather than the parliament. As judges consider both criminal and civil matters, they make decisions, deliver rulings and develop precedents. Taken together, these things constitute common law. A good deal of civil law, such as torts and negligence, began life as common law.  Common law takes some law-making pressure off parliament and allows for laws to respond to real life situations.

What is the difference between Common and Civil Law?

Common Law

– 2 rules, do no harm or threat of harm

– Freedom, responsibility, and Liability

– No need for permission for anything

– Considered responsible (Innocent)

Civil Law

– Thousands of Laws




– Limited Freedom, responsibility, liability

What are the various types of legal systems?

– Civil Law: Main source of law is statutes

– Common Law: Main source of law are statutes, case law and also equity

– Religious Law: Main source of law is religious in text

– Customary Law: Main source of law is established pattern of behavior

– Hybrid: Some mixture of the aforementioned systems

What are some examples of Common Law Protections?

– The privilege against self-incrimination

– Legal professional privilege

– Access to the courts

– Access to legal counsel when an indigent (poor) person is accused of a serious crime

– Immunity from interference with vested property rights including native title rights

– Immunity from deprivation of liberty except by law

– Freedom of speech and movement

– Procedural fairness when affected by exercise of public power

Some examples of countries practicing common and civil law system

Common Law

– UK, Canada, USA, Australia, New Zealand, India, Nigeria, South Africa, Southern Cameroons

Civil Law

– Russia, France, Mali, Niger, La Republique Du Cameroun

Main Differences between Common and Civil Law

Common Law Civil Law
Case Law Principle of legality
Based on customs/English Law Based on Roman Law
Trial dominated by lawyers with judge as referee Judge participates actively seeking for evidence and examining witnesses
Judge and Jury One or a panel of judges
Judge uses inductive reasoning about the facts Judge uses deductive reasoning
Court may fashion an equitable remedy-one that is “fair” Inappropriate for court to fashion a remedy not set forth in the code
Greater opportunity for false positive or false negative Greater opportunity for corruption

 

What are the systems based on?

Common Law

– Based on precedent, custom and interpretation

– Judge can interpret laws

– Ownership established by use

– Innocent until proven guilty

– Contracts tend to be longer, more detailed

– Contract performance except for Acts of God

– More adversarial/more Lawsuits

Civil Law

– Based on written codes and detailed laws

– Judge can apply laws

– Ownership established by registration

– Guilty until proven innocent

– Contracts tend to be shorter

– Contract performance has ” Acts of God’ which include unforeseable acts

– Less adversarial/less lawsuits

 

Cameroon:State of emergency decleared in Wum Southern Cameroon ,military helicopter spotted

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

There are reports of a civil unest in Wum following the killing of a motor cycle rider by a military man.The incident happened in the early hours of  this sunday morning of 24th January 2016, at 3:am,after an argument between the two men.

 The  okada driver was  stabbed and killed by the military man in a beer parlour following a brawl over a woman
in wum town, Menchum division NorthWest region. They were arguing over a woman they both befriended.
five people have so far  sustain   gunshot wounds.
 A source in Wum speeaking on telephone to alafnet.com, says the popultation  of Wum got angry and burnt down  two Toyota Landcruisers belonging to the Cameroonian army,part of the military camp and properties of the military man who is no where to be seen after the incident burnt down. Our source say the army officer is  an Ewondo man and we letter got his name as chef Alpha.
The administratioin  has decleared a state of emergency in Wum and  military helicopter continues to  hovers overhead.
Movements of persons have been restricted and more army  reinforcement have  arrive from Bamenda.wum-4 wum-6 wum5

PENAL CODE REINFORCES SECESSION CHARGE, 16 SCNC MEMBERS ARRESTED IN BUEA

buea-backgroundCameroon’s dictator, Paul Biya, finally promulgated into law the new penal code (Law No. 2016/007 of 12 July 2016).whose adoption by both houses of parliament received condemnation from most national stakeholders including civil society organizations, Bar Council,  and protest from lawyers

Recalled that the sections which sparked widespread condemnation included granting government ministers immunity from prosecution, along with other provisions punishing rent defaulters. The presidency finally did some words changing on the immunity section.

However, the penal code adoption did go without BaretaNews looking at some provisions which caught our attention. Section 111 on secession. It reads

Section 111: Secession

(1) Whoever undertakes in whatever manner to infringe the territorial integrity of the Republic shall be punished with imprisonment for life.
(2) In time of war, or in a state of emergency or siege, the penalty shall be death.

The Government has previously been cracking down on the arrest of Southern Cameroons leaders and activists. A host of them is under detention. We still holds the view that Secession does not hold in the Cameroons context because the union between both Cameroons is not legally bound. Cameroun cannot charge citizens of former British Southern Cameroons for secession and in no court of law when the facts are presented could Cameroun win.

On Monday 18th July, Cameroun forces cracked down on 16 Southern Cameroon’s leaders . They have been arrested and detained at the Central Police Station Buea. They include Mbua Richard, Matthias Besong, ABANG Njousi, Nke Valentine and others. Statements have been extracted from them . BaretaNews shall within the hours ahead provide details on their arrest. We of this platform condemns such an arrest of peaceful loving Southern Cameroonians whose only crime is to question the legality of this unholy union.

RESOLUTIONS

pah-nforThe National Executive Committee, (NECO) and National Council of the Southern Cameroons National Council, (The COUNCIL) met respectively on July, 15 and 16, 2016 in Bamenda. It examined and deliberated on the life of the movement at home and the Diaspora, state of the nation and international scene and took the following Resolutions.

THE LIFE OF THE MOVEMENT

From the County Chairpersons’ reports, The Council noted that due to crushing poverty and general hardship, Grassroots structures were no longer as viable as before.

Council also received Diaspora report from Mr Albert Zama, the representative from SCNC – USA Chapter who actively participated and made profound contributions to the debates.

Council received from the National Chairman fraternal warm greetings and brief report from Mr Cletus Fondo, representative from Canada who due to time constraint regretted his inevitable departure to catch his return flight.

Considering the challenging task at hand, The Council directs as follows;

  1. That the redynamisation of Grassroots structures – the Precincts, the LGAs and the Counties should be completed and lists submitted at next National Council meeting.
  2. That the Secretary General should finalise arrangements and organise fresh elections to replace the deceased County Chairperson of Ngoketunjia County and report at next Council meeting.
  3. That County Chairpersons as a nationalistic duty should build bridges with all the vital forces within their respective areas of jurisdiction.
  4. That Diaspora Chapters should be all inclusive, serving as the British Southern Cameroons sanctuary for national renaissance, be redynamised to effectively assume their ambassadorial role and intensify their lobbying roles as well as contribute materially, logistically and financially towards the realisation of the ultimate goal of the struggle, namely, national independence and sovereignty.
  5. That Diaspora Chairpersons should communicate more frequently with the National Secretariat to keep abreast with authentic information to avoid being misled with distorted information.
  6. That counting the odds all members should rededicate themselves to being the barefoot soldier and should carry out effective education of Southern Cameroonians to know the legal truth, their legal rights for once they are empowered they will become more assertive and properly defend their collective identity. To this effect Council lauded the efforts of the National Chairman and the staff of the National Secretariat in constantly producing sound educational materials. Council graciously received the 2nd edition of National Renaissance which was launched by Mr. Albert Zama and called on all to read and spread the political gospel for national rebirth.

LIFE OF THE BRITISH SOUTHERN CAMEROONS NATION

COUNCIL PAINFULLY NOTES

  1. That the annexationist ruling clan piloted by an ethnic oligarchy persists in its oppressive, exploitative determination to extinct British Southern Cameroons from the map of Africa for the prestige and grandeur of la Republique du Cameroun.
  2. That the Yaounde regime is determined to annihilate all the Anglo-Saxon cultural heritage while paying lip service to “unification” to deceive and mislead the gullible Southern Cameroonians and those with weak spines.
  3. That the annexation and assimilation agenda has no room for dialogue, negotiation and compromises for these are predicated on respect and equal standing of the partners concerned.
  4. That Yaounde’s bold-attack on our inherited Anglo-Saxon educational system and the Common Law under the pretext of harmonisation and recent decree on the nationalisation of the CDC and transfer of its headquarters from Bota – Victoria in British Southern Cameroons to la Republique du Cameroun, must be seen as a sharp knife the annexationist regime wants to drive through our heart.

THE COUNCIL




-Takes judicious note of the growing nationalistic consciousness in Southern Cameroonians thanks to the educational materials issued by the SCNC, other patriots, and the good work of the print media and the audio and calls on all vital forces, the youths, the women and men to strengthen the patriotic bonds of unity and defend our inherent right to a sovereign homeland. He who fails to defend his self worth and identity but depends on and slavishly serves his slave master to attain a subordinate status will remain a serf forever.

-Congratulates the Common Law Lawyers, the various Teachers Trade Unions, the Education Forum on the Anglo-Saxon educational heritage for the good work courageously initiated. The drive from all angles should be towards the liberation and restoration of the sovereign statehood of British Southern Cameroons. Harmonisation is assimilation for the consolidation of annexation and colonial occupation, that’s total annihilation of the British Southern Cameroons nation.

-Salutes the Bamenda Market Women, the Buyam Sellam, the Petty traders for rising up to say “NO” to the intensification of exploitation, over taxation, economic genocide visited on Southern Cameroons, for the glory of the Yaounde oligarchy and its mentor Paris.

-Calls on the total mobilisation and organisation of all the vital forces for national liberation, the key to our collective dignity, progress and prosperity.

-Assures the Bamenda Market Women and all the petty traders that removing the current Government Delegate and replacing him with another, changes nothing. The problem is with the system which is anti-people, insensitive, nonchalant and inherently corrupt and irredeemably autocratic. Under Yaounde British Southern Cameroons will forever remain a farm and a mine for mindless exploitation and plunder.

-Reminds the dynamic mothers and youths of our beloved Fatherland, British Southern Cameroons, abundantly blessed by God, that British Southern Cameroons is not an integral part of la Republique du Cameroun. We are a separate nation and a distinct people under international law entitled to sovereign independence. This is our inherent right and in unity under the Lord of Justice, we will triumphantly restore our Government in Buea-the key to our political salvation, economic development and progress.

-Reiterates SCNC’s irrevocable commitment to national restoration and calls on all forces to jump on the SCNC liberation train for a holistic approach for a permanent solution of rebuilding the British Southern Cameroons nation on constitutional democracy, effective separation of powers, rule of law, participatory democracy, where those in authority rule by the consent of the governed and remain transparent and accountable to the ruled in whom resides popular sovereignty.

-Calls on all Southern Cameroons political and economic elites, the intelligentsia, Common Law Lawyers at home and abroad, Traditional Rulers, Religious Authorities to put an end to playing the ostrich game and understand that what took place in Wum was not against the victims nor is the plan to transfer the CDC Headquarters to a town in la Republique du Cameroun an affront or attack on the Bakweri or a matter for Fako County. What became of the CamBank and the Produce Marketing Board nationalised and transferred after the 1972 fraudulent referendum? While the Wum Saga demonstrates the impunity of the Yaounde regime against us, the planned transfer of the CDC Headquarters which confirms Dr. Endeley’s prediction, stands as the last straw to break the camel’s back which must be resisted energetically by all us. To pretend to be indifferent is to deny your roots and betray God’s will.

-Reaffirms that the CDC, its headquarters in Bota, Victoria is to British Southern Cameroons what Fako Mountain, Victoria natural deep seaport, Kupe Manenguba Mountain, Kilum Mountain is/are to British Southern Cameroonians; inseparable and in transferable. We have had enough of Yaoundé’s arm twisting aimed at the consolidation of annexation, annihilation and assimilation of our Fatherland, British Southern Cameroons. The will of the people through collective resistance for national rebirth must triumph for their dignity. Rebellion against foreign aggression in collective national self-defence is neither a crime nor a sin for as God created Mt Fako as part of this our heritage; the CDC was established by law in 1947 for the defined purpose of the development of British Southern Cameroons. It is our heritage!

ON THE INTERNATIONAL SCENE, THE COUNCIL;

  1. Disturbed by grave sufferings of the innocent Africans within the Lake Chad Basin due to Boko Haram’s menaces, the growing waves of insurgencies on the African continent and in the world at large,
  2. Grieved by the constant numerous deaths of Africans in the Sahara Desert and Mediterranean Sea in their desperate efforts to flee from oppression and economic misery perpetrated by the tyrants on the African continent,
  3. Cognisant of the persistent depletion of the limited resources of African nations by their Presidential Monarchs and their cronies which are stored in safe havens in Europe, the Americas and West Indies,
  4. Mindful of the holding of the 2016 AU Summit in Kigali, Rwanda,
  5. Considering the referendum in the UK on Brexit and the appointment of a new Prime Minister,
  6. Conscious of the UN’s founding mission to humanity and the prevention of wars that cause human suffering,

THE COUNCIL

1 (a)- Salutes the joint task force fighting the Boko Haram insurgents and appeal to the international community to intensify their support in the resettlement and rehabilitation of displaced people to enable the affected rebuild their lives.

(b)- In acknowledging and commending the efforts at fighting terrorism in Africa and the world at large, prays due attention should be given to finding out the root causes of terrorism – the growing threat to global security and human development.

2.(a)-Mourns with the affected families and calls on Africans in general to rise up and enthrone democracy and the rule of law the sure guarantor of peace and unity based on justice and enduring economic development and human progress.

(b) Calls on western nations to stop collaborating with African dictators at the detriment of Africa and cooperate with all Africans in their legitimate efforts to attain both political and economic freedom and independence.

  1. a)- Makes a special appeal to western democratic nations to assist African nations in recovering looted funds by corrupt African leaders.

b)- Calls on western nations to adopt legislation making it a crime for any bank to assist in hiding looted funds for as corruption, embezzlement are responsible for  Africa’s underdevelopment, refugees will continue to invade the shores of Europe and America. Corruption and embezzlement of public funds in Africa is contagious. African democracy, the rule of law and development will enhance global development and stability.

  1. a) -Congratulates the Government and people of Rwanda for playing host to the AU Summit of July 2016.

b)- Warmly salutes the AU Commission and the AU Summit for adopting an African Common Passport which will greatly facilitate trade, services and tourism within the African Continent and boost the drive towards African Unity.

  1. c) – Reminds African leaders that till date the Constructive Dialogue approved by the AU Summit of 2009 under the Good Offices of the African Commission between Southern Cameroons leaders and the Government of President Paul Biya of la Republique du Cameroun has not taken place.
  2. d) – Calls on the AU Summit to take all necessary disposition and ensure the holding of the Constructive Dialogue in the AU Headquarters, Addis Ababa, within a specified time frame. But should President Paul Biya continue to with impunity ignore the AU Summit approved Ruling and recommendation, the continental body through the Chairperson of the AU Commission should table the British Southern Cameroons Question at the UN under Article 35 of the UN Charter.
  3. a)-Takes judicious note of the will of the British people expressed through the ballot box.
  4. b) -Congratulates the British people in expressing their inherent and eternal right of self-determination and their decision to exit the European Union which is now subject of negotiation to determine the future relationship between the U.K. and E.U.

c)- Congratulates the new Prime Minister, The RT. HON. THERESA MAY on her deserved election to this prestigious post.

d)- In congratulating and welcoming Mrs. Theresa May to this prestigious post, Council draws her High attention to Britain’s unfinished task in the UN Trust Territory of Southern Cameroons under UK Mandate in that botched decolonisation facilitated annexation and colonial occupation for UK failed in her sacred responsibility- moral and legal- to ensure the implementation of UN Resolution 1608 of April 21,1961.

e)- Calls on PM Theresa May, that as a mother and Chief negotiator on Brexit and in view of the error of 1961, she should write her name in gold in the sands of history by leading her government place the British Southern Cameroons Question on the agenda of the UN for peaceful exit of British Southern Cameroons from annexation and colonial occupation of la Republique du Cameroun.

6.a)- Draws the attention of the UN to the fact that the UN Trust territory of the Southern Cameroons under UK Administration is the only Trust territory which unlike all others that graduated from trusteeship to sovereign independence; the Southern Cameroons, due to non- implementation of UNGA Resolution 1608 of April 21, 1961, descended into annexation and colonial occupation and assimilation under another former UN Trust territory, la Republique du Cameroun, which had its independence from France on January 1, 1960.

  1. b) –Mindful of UN’s declaration of annexation as a crime against humanity and threat to world peace, calls on the UN to listen to the legitimate cry of the British Southern Cameroonian people and apply the very measures that were applied in similar circumstances such as in Namibia, East Timor, among others, to free the people from the consequences of UN’s failure to respect Art. 76(b) of UN Charter and UNGA Res. 1514 of 1960, and save Africa from genocide. One more genocide that the UN could have avoided, will be genocide too many for the African continent and an irremovable scar on the UN.

 

Done in Bamenda, this 16th July, 2016.

 

 

NFOR, N. NFOR

National Chairman (SCNC)

THE WUM SAGA: THE PLIGHT OF BRITISH SOUTHERN CAMEROONS UNDER IMPERIAL RULE

H.E. BAN KI-MOON,

UN SECRETERY GENERAL,

UN SECRETARIAT, NEW YORK,

USA

YOUR EXCELLENCY,

MEMORANDUM

THE WUM SAGA: THE PLIGHT OF BRITISH SOUTHERN CAMEROONS UNDER IMPERIAL RULE

History has demonstrated again and again over the centuries that an imperial power respects no standards and no law. It is simply an embodiment of evil. It is easier for hawks in their numbers flapping their wings to chase away a lion from its prey than to have an imperial power feeding fat on its occupied land to respect international law, conventions and good conscience and withdraw honorably. This explains the case of imperial la Republique du Cameroun in British Southern Cameroons. But the day of reckoning as declared by the Lord of justice is not far.

 

On Friday April 22nd, 2016, some 19 detainees from Wum, Menchum County of British Southern Cameroons who had been in the Bamenda detention camp since January 2016, for fear of confrontation with the population, were under the cover of darkness transferred to Yaounde, la Republique du Cameroun. Prior to being transferred under heavily armed troops, these defenseless suspects, as if this detention under life-threatening conditions was not bad enough, were tortured to break their will power and spirits. The 19 transferred to Yaounde by Order No.090/ORD/C1/16 of April 16, 2016 signed by Chief Judge of the Yaounde Military Court, Captain Fredric POH MBOLULE are;

 

  1. Quala Dze Queenta____________ born on Dec. 02, 1993. She is pregnant.
  2. Livingstone Fung Achuo________ Oct.  10,  1990
  3. Joseph Afuh Ngourou__________ March 02, 1975
  4. Mamouda Sule________________ May    20,  1998
  5. Azang Hamlep Azang___________ born   in about 1998
  6. Kingsley Njuh Kelley___________ born  in about   1989
  7. Abang Modest Amih___________ born on April 25, 1993
  8. Nasser Fontoh_________________ March 03, 1985
  9. Ngong Solos Wallang____________ May   13,  1974
  10. Franck Tsu Itie_________________ in about  1979
  11. Gerald Kum Chou______________ on March 16, 1985
  12. Nestor Kangsen Mbah___________ on Feb. 14, 1992
  13. Marcel Fung Mih_______________ July 22, 1989
  14. Ewi Alain Meeh________________ Aug. 28, 1993
  15. Bruno Lumba Nkemta___________ in 1985

 

  1. Canisius Ngong Yoh_____________ in 1989
  2. Emmanuel Achou Kum__________ on March 30, 1998
  3. Tibi Vincent Tebug alias Ojong____ born on Oct. 02, 1978
  4. Tem Josua Mua_________________ born on Sept. 13, 1999

 

Plus two soldiers working in Wum;

  1. Athanase Ateba Mvodo
  2. Pierre Gaetan Kame Nkoo

 

This Order which is issued completely in French, and that dictates the language of the masters and in which they will be tried, concludes that these suspects will be at the Kondengui Maximum detention till Oct. 07, 2016. That is to say Queenta’s baby who had been a prisoner in the womb will be born a prisoner without a crime except that God created him/her a British Southern Cameroonian.

 

The 19 suspects were not arrested in the act but many days later through a kale-kale in Wum town and as such should be presumed innocent until proven guilty by the law. This kale-kale, as usual, took place in the wee hours of the morning when peace loving citizens are deep asleep.

 

These are not the first Southern Cameroonian suspects arrested in Southern Cameroons for allegedly committing a crime on British Southern Cameroons soil which falls under the Common Law jurisdiction that have had to be transferred without the knowledge of their family members and lawyers. Since the 1992 episode in which late Justice Nyo Wakai, a retired Judge of the Supreme Court, and one hundred and seventy two (172) other leaders and militants of the SDF detained at the BMM Up-Station, Bamenda, after the heavily flawed presidential elections of October 1992 in which the victor, Ni John Fru Ndi, a Southern Cameroonian, became the vanquished, many other Southern Cameroonians have suffered this same high handed barbarism of la Republique du Cameroun.

 

Your Excellency, what provoked mob action that led to the burning of the make-shift military barracks in Wum was the murder of Leonard Mih Ngong aged 23 years by a francophone soldier in the night and the insensitive attitude of the proconsuls who treated it as if it were the death of a careless chicken. This nonchalant attitude only came to ignite held up anger, a sad reminder of several complaints tabled against the forces to the authorities who did nothing to establish healthy relationship between civilian population and the forces who behave as lords of a conquered territory. While the population is mourning the irreparable and irreplaceable lose of their dear son, compatriot and bread winner of the poor family, no one is talking about the Francophone murderer soldier who like others before was immediately protected.  The murder of Leornard Mih Ngong over his snatched girl friend was a premeditated act. Similar murders by these occupation forces, such as that of Mbengwi, to teach “les Anglos” an unforgettable lesson have taken place in the past in other towns of British Southern Cameroons. What happens is immediate transfer of the holier than thou “home” and that ends the story.

 

Beginning from the Ebubu, Tombel massacre in 1962, the numerous unprovoked kale kales, the Black Saturday in Ndu, the states of emergency of the 1990, 1992, 1997 and the economic blockade of 1993, code named Operation Dorade, the murder of unarmed peace-loving SCNC activists in Kumbo, on Oct. 1st. 2001 and other acts of vandalism, these and more have made the Southern Cameroonian conclude that under la Republique du Cameroun he is neither safe, secured nor has he hope and a future in freedom and dignity. This reminds him of the good old days of British Southern Cameroons where, in freedom, under rule of law, enjoying social justice, he was his own master with the sky as the only limit.

 

Your Excellency, Sir, the one billion dollar question is, if this is not concrete evidence of treating British Southern Cameroons and its people as a conquered and occupied land and subjugated people, how many citizens of la Republique du Cameroun arrested, for an alleged crime committed on their

 

home soil, have been transferred for trial under the Common Law jurisdiction in British Southern Cameroons? To the Yaounde authorities the people of British Southern Cameroons are a subjugated people with no rights, no dignity: disregarding uti possedetis juris and the critical date and Art. 4(b) of the AU Constitutive Act, this former UN Trust territory does not exist to merit any respect.

 

Having with impunity flouted the Banjul Ruling on Communication 266/2003 approved by the AU Summit of July 2009 which recognized Southern Cameroonians as a distinct people, from those of la Republique du Cameroun, entitled to the unquestionable right of self-determination and called for Constructive Dialogue, the annexationist regime has continued to intensify its military repression. Furthermore, it has continued to kidnap our fellow compatriots and like looted cargo humiliatingly ferry them to la Republique du Cameroun for brutal and dehumanizing interrogation, torture and trial under kangaroo courts. This is in gross violation of the Banjul Ruling in which the Commission called on the Respondent State, la Republique du Cameroun, to forth with put an end to “the transfer of accused persons from the Anglophone Provinces (British Southern Cameroons) for trial in the Francophone Provinces.” The Respondent State is called upon to ensure “that every person facing criminal charges be tried under the language he /she understands.”(Emphasis, mine).

 

This calls to question the so called bi-cultural, bi-jurial, and bilingual Cameroun which the apologists of the Yaounde regime, to protect their crumbs, propagate and pretentiously defend. If no citizen of la Republique du Cameroun brought up under the Civil Law system has ever been transferred for trial under the Common Law jurisdiction, why should citizens of British Southern Cameroons brought up under the Common Law be transferred and tried under the Civil Law in a foreign language – French?

 

Sir, nothing illustrates the unbearable and humiliating treatment British Southern Cameroonians are subjected to than the contrasting treatment Wum suspects have had to endure and humane treat given Mora, Far North Region of la Republique du Cameroun where the Boko Haram insurgents are marauding. For those who doubt or question the reasoned presentation in this Memorandum, let them find out how the Yaounde authorities responded to the setting ablaze of the barracks in Mora in October 2015 by a mob. Was there a kale-kale? Were there arrests and humiliating torture in public and are there any now languishing in Kondengui Maximum Prison, Yaounde like those of Wum?

 

We must here firmly understand one thing: neither imperialism nor annexation can be reformed. It is hard core evil pure and simple. It must be over thrown for the subjugated people to regain their freedom and dignity. The Yaounde state will never treat British Southern Cameroons as the equal of la Republique du Cameroun due to non-implementation of UNGA Resolution 1608 of April 21, 1961 that facilitated annexation and subjugation. We do not belong. British Southern Cameroons and la Republique du Cameroun can never belong as equals under one national polity. Historically, culturally and legally, they belong apart and for peace based on justice and stability in the region, separation respecting colonial inherited boundary is the only permanent solution.

 

Your Excellency, if the international community is not begging for another Rwanda, to nip the inevitable in the board, they all should mount pressure on la Republique du Cameroun to submit to the Constructive Dialogue under the Good Offices of the African Commission as approved by the AU Summit of July 2009 in Libya. Consistent repression, kale-kales ( i.e. organised state terrorism), transfer of suspects for trial in a foreign language under the civil law system, persistent killings of unarmed civilians by occupation forces, economic rape, among others, has put the two distinct Cameroons, held together by the barrel of the gun, on a ticking time bomb: the inevitable explosion will have grave consequences for the AU and the UN as a whole for their prolonged culture of silence.

 

Where has it, annexation or imperialism, triumphed unto eternity? British Southern Cameroons will not be the exception!

 

 

As for our compatriots kidnapped to the gulag in Yaounde as if they were war captives to await the worse;

YOUR EXCELLENCY, WE SOLEMNLY APPEAL;

To the UN and international community at large, all defenders of human rights and fundamental freedoms, the rule of law and fair trial, to mount pressure on President Paul Biya to bring back these compatriots to British Southern Cameroons where they are alleged to have committed the crime for fair and expeditious trial. To be tried in a foreign land under a strange legal system by foreign judges in a foreign language, which the accused do not understand, will tantamount to persecution not prosecution.

  • To the UN, AU, Commonwealth, all human rights organizations committed to justice and the rule of law, to assist in whichever way possible or to monitor the trial of these compatriots and ensure that they receive fair trial and this implies that they should be tried under the Common Law system, investigations and interrogations, the giving of evidence in court and trial are all in English, and the trial is conducted by Common Law Judges.
  • That the Francophone soldier murderer is brought back to British Southern Cameroons where he committed the heinous crime and given fair trial under the Common Law system.

 

In conclusion, the UN having declared annexation a crime against humanity and threat to world peace, remaining silent and withholding your positive action from according these unfortunate people of Wum origin the right of fair hearing and expeditious fair trial, an act which will bring to international lime light la Republique du Cameroun’s annexation, imposition of foreign domination and alien rule in British Southern Cameroons, will tantamount to giving the violator of international law a pat on the back. Saddam Hussein of Iraq never enjoyed such treatment when he annexed Kuwait and reduced it to the 19th Province of Iraq.

 

We seek JUSTICE within the ambit of international law!

 

 

Done, in Buea, this day, 27 April, 2016.

 

For the SCNC and on behalf of the people of British Southern Cameroons.

 

 

 

____________________________

NFOR, NGALA NFOR

(National Chairman, SCNC)

 

Cc,

All UN Member Nations,

Chairman of AU Commission, Addis Ababa

President of ICJ, Den Haag,

President of ICC, Den Haag,

President, Pan African Parliament, Johannesburg

African Court of Justice,

Commonwealth SG, London,

President of ACHPR, Banjul,

All Diplomatic Missions, Yaounde

High Commissioner of UN Human Rights Commission, Geneva,

Human Rights Bodies Accredited with the UN, among others.

 New Anti-Terrorism Law Batters Cameroonians Seeking Secession

By Mbom Sixtus Reprint |

YAOUNDE, Apr 26 2015 (IPS) – Cameroon’s government under President Paul Biya is bearing down on a separatist movement fighting for the rights of a minority English-language region, using as its weapon a sweeping new anti-terrorism law introduced at the end of last year.

The separatist Southern Cameroons National Council (SCNC) – which is demanding an independent Southern Cameroons made up of Cameroon’s Northwest and Southwest Regions – has been targeted under the new law, which forbids public meetings, street protests or any action that the government deems to be disturbing the peace.southern_cameroon_map

Map showing location of Southern Cameroons (highlighted). Credit: Wikimedia Commons Public Domain

English-speaking Cameroonians make up over 22 percent of the country’s population of 20 million.

Long desired by Western powers for its beauty and natural resources, Cameroon was first occupied by the Germans in 1884. After the First World War, the French and British carved it up between them as League of Nations mandates – four-fifths went to France, the rest to the United Kingdom.

A federation was declared in 1961, followed by the annexation of the English-language region into the United Republic of Cameroon, with its capital in Yaounde in 1972. Dissension continues to seethe, however, in the English-speaking regions which resent the lack of control over their assets.

Over the years, Cameroon has downplayed its problems with the English-speaking regions, while making token placements of a few of their citizens in its administration.

Secessionists say this relationship of inequality has led to impoverishment of the territory and its population and a diminishment of their educational and cultural heritage, while feeding the flame of ethnic strife between the people of the Northwest and Southwest Regions.

The extraction of oil and the expropriation of Cameroon’s substantial oil revenues is frequently cited as the touchstone for frustration and anger among those of the struggling south.

The separatist Southern Cameroons National Council (SCNC) has been targeted under Cameroon’s new anti-terrorism law, which forbids public meetings, street protests or any action that the government deems to be disturbing the peace

In this regard, the Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI) gave Cameroon a “failing grade”, ranking it 47th out of 58 countries for such weaknesses as enabling environment, safeguards and quality controls, and reporting practices.

“Cameroon’s national oil company (SNH) dominates the sector,” NRGI reported. “It is directly controlled by the Presidency … The largest revenue streams are collected by SNH and transferred quarterly to the national treasury after subtracting the company’s operational costs – meaning that some oil revenues never reach the treasury.”

Aside from publishing environment impact assessments, Cameroon provides very little information on its extractive sector, noted NRGI, while it performed near the bottom of rankings on measures of budgetary openness and the rule of law.

Oil exploration, production and refining all take place in Southern Cameroons, while oil-derived revenues are paid to the state coffers directly in Yaounde.

Against this background, and since Cameroon’s President Paul Biya endorsed an anti-terrorism law in December 2014, the SCNC has not been able to organise any major gathering.

An attempt this month, on Apr. 3, ended with the arrest of Nfor Ngala Nfor, SCNC Vice National Chairman, and six others in Buea, Southwest Region.

Andrew Kang, who had hosted the SCNC leaders, told IPS from his hospital bed at the Buea Regional Hospital that security forces barged into his house while he and the guests were about to have a meal. “We were not even permitted to eat our food. They just beat us, ordered us to move and led us to the station. We spent four days in a prison cell and only regained freedom at about 5 pm on Apr. 6.”

Kang denied the government’s charges of promoting secession and rebellion which had been levelled against the group.

Talking to IPS, Martin Fon Yembe, a member of the SCNC and human rights activist, said that while the government made it seem that the new anti-terrorism law was designed to boost the fight against Boko Haram, the main aim was to stop the holding of SCNC meetings and gatherings.

“Everyone knows that law was put in place to hinder the activities of the movement and there is no gainsaying the fact that it poses a problem,” he said.

Related IPS Articles

A U.S. State Department human rights report on Cameroon in 2013 referred to security force torture and abuse, denial of fair and speedy public trials and restrictions on freedom of assembly and association. “Although the government took some steps to punish officials who commit abuses in the security forces and in the public service, impunity remained a problem,” said the report.

Meanwhile, thousands of Southern Cameroonians are currently in exile in Europe and the United States and thousands more are on the run because of their support for the separatist movement.

The Biya administration, on the other hand, presents a picture of a country unswervingly headed for growth. In a document titled Cameroun Vision 2035, a long-term vision is described which envisages the consolidation of democracy, enhancement of national unity, economic development and increasing employment.

Under a three-year plan, unveiled in December, Cameroon will spend 1.75 billion dollars “to meet the immediate needs of the population,” focusing on sectors such as road infrastructure, health, agriculture, energy and security.

“The special programme, evaluated at 925 billion CFA francs, is financed through the mobilisation of the required resources from local and international financial institutions at sustainable rates,” Prime Minister Philemon Yang said without giving further details.

In the latest twist to the South Cameroons issue, a meeting this month of Cameroon’s English-speaking lawyers gave notice that an All-Anglophone Lawyers Conference would be held shortly in Bamenda, chief city of the Northwest Region, “to develop strategies at safeguarding the Common Law and to map out the way forward for the Southern Cameroons territory,” the Cameroon Concord reported.

The news online was met with over a dozen enthused readers. “Machiavelli Ayuk” of the University of Buea wrote: “This is the kind of action that the marginalised Anglophone people love to hear. At last we have some Educated Elites in the Anglophone zone…”

The comment was followed by “Fast Man”, a self-described fieldworker, who wrote: “I hope the lawyers use their intelligence and remember their oath. We will never go anywhere under French hegemony. God bless the Southern Cameroons and its citizens…

Proudly powered by Themelexus.com